Inspector-General of Police Razarudin Husain said five reports had been received on the matter, Harian Metro reported.
“Although freedom of expression is provided under the Federal Constitution, there is a limit.
“Statements of such a nature may constitute an offence under the Penal Code, specifically those that incite public disorder,” he was quoted as saying.
He added that Kok was being investigated under Sections 298 and 505(b) of the Penal Code and Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 (CMA).
Section 298 of the Penal Code prescribes the offence of intentionally wounding the religious feelings of others, while Section 505(b) pertains to making statements that incite public disorder. Section 233 of the CMA is for the misuse of network facilities.
Razarudin said that as per standard operating procedure for cases touching on race, religion and royalty (3R), any investigation will be conducted based on the reports received, and witnesses will be called.
On Thursday, religious affairs minister Na’im Mokhtar said the Malaysian Islamic development department (Jakim) was considering the proposal, as obtaining halal certification was currently on a voluntary basis for restaurant operators or food business owners.
In response, Kok, who is DAP vice-chairman, called for the halal certification to remain a voluntary process, and for the government to allow business operators to decide based on market demand rather than being forced to do so.
She said the proposal for halal certification could impose significant burdens on small businesses, restrict consumer freedom and may clash with Malaysia’s cultural diversity.
Kok added that making the requirement compulsory may provoke negative reactions domestically and embarrass Malaysia on the international stage.
Her comments drew the ire of several quarters, including Bersatu Youth chief Wan Ahmad Fayhsal Wan Ahmad Kamal and the Malay Chamber of Commerce Malaysia.
In a statement, DAP secretary-general Loke Siew Fook said Kok had not violated any laws in carrying out her duties and responsibilities as an MP. He said she was merely “expressing views on a government policy”.
He added that DAP’s legal bureau will provide support to Kok in the course of the investigation.