Judge Asyraf based on his ability to lead Mara, critics told

Judge Asyraf based on his ability to lead Mara, critics told

Umno's Wan Agyl Wan Hassan says capable individuals should be allowed to contribute to the growth and development of GLCs regardless of their political affiliation.

Wan Agyl Wan Hassan (left) said Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki’s appointment as Mara chairman should not be dismissed based on his political connections.
PETALING JAYA:
An Umno man has told those criticising the appointment of Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki as the new Mara chairman to judge him based on his qualifications and capabilities rather than his political links.

Umno Youth permanent chairman Wan Agyl Wan Hassan conceded that concerns over Asyraf’s appointment were reasonable, but called on his critics to analyse his qualifications and credentials first, rather than dismiss him based on his political career.

“If he has the required qualifications, abilities and expertise to perform well in his new capacity, it might set a positive precedent for future political appointments. This would be the case if he possesses these talents and knowledge,” he told FMT.

Asyraf’s appointment as Mara chairman has come under criticism. Yesterday, anti-corruption activist Edmund Terence Gomez said the government should not have appointed an Umno politician to head one of the most important government-linked companies (GLCs) in the country, adding that it raised “a lot of red flags”.

Former Umno information chief Shahril Hamdan had also said the appointment may give the public the impression that it was a “reward” for Asyraf’s support for party president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi.

Electoral watchdog Bersih also questioned the government if it had changed its stance on political appointments to GLCs.

Wan Agyl said it was crucial to ensure that individuals appointed to key positions possessed the right skills, track record and qualifications, regardless of their political affiliation.

By doing this, he said, it would be able to dispel the “unfavourable notion” that political appointments were generally harmful.

“In the end, promoting transparency and meritocracy in the selection process is the most important factor in eradicating the negative connotation associated with political appointments in GLCs.

“This will serve to establish trust and confidence in the system, allowing capable individuals, regardless of their political connections, to contribute to the growth and development of these companies,” he said.

Stay current - Follow FMT on WhatsApp, Google news and Telegram

Subscribe to our newsletter and get news delivered to your mailbox.