Hong Kong court to rule in major national security case

Hong Kong court to rule in major national security case

Forty-seven people face life in prison under China's national security law passed in 2020.

Cases under Hong Kong’s national security law have a 100% conviction rate, with 114 people found guilty so far. (AP pic)
HONG KONG:
A Hong Kong court will deliver verdicts this week in the biggest case brought against pro-democracy campaigners since China imposed a national security law to crush dissent.

Forty-seven people from a cross-section of Hong Kong’s then-opposition face life in prison on subversion charges for political activities in 2020, following democracy protests that saw millions take to the streets.

Thirty-one members of the group — which includes democratically elected lawmakers, union members and academics — have pleaded guilty.

Three judges handpicked by the government to try national security cases are scheduled to deliver verdicts against the remaining 16 on Thursday and Friday.

Cases under the national security law and related crimes, such as sedition, have a 100% conviction rate, with 114 people found guilty since the legislation came into force in 2020.

Rights groups say the law undermines civil liberties that were meant to be enshrined under a 1997 agreement to hand the former British colony back to China.

The government says the law is needed to crack down on major crimes such as collusion and secession after the massive, and at times violent, pro-democracy demonstrations in 2019.

Beijing’s Hong Kong Affairs Office had said the defendants staged “a severe challenge against Hong Kong’s constitutional order” by organising and joining an unofficial primary election in July 2020.

The primary was meant to shortlist some pro-democracy candidates for the city’s official legislature election — which was later cancelled by authorities.

Prosecutors said the defendants planned to seize a legislative majority to force Hong Kong authorities to meet five demands raised by protesters in 2019.

The demands included launching an independent inquiry into alleged police brutality against protesters and gaining universal suffrage for both the city’s leader and lawmakers.

Prosecutors also alleged that the defendants intended to force the chief executive to step down by “indiscriminately” vetoing the budget.

Most of the defendants in the case have been in jail since the group was first brought to court in March 2021.

The 16 who pleaded not guilty faced a 118-day trial which was conducted without a jury, departing from the city’s 178-year-old common law tradition.

Sentences in the case will not be announced this week, but expected this year.

The case has been closely watched by the international community, with the US and other Western nations criticising China for quashing democracy in Hong Kong.

The arrest of the defendants at dawn on Jan 6, 2021 — including legal scholar Benny Tai and prominent lawmakers “Long Hair” Leung Kwok-hung and Claudia Mo — triggered the US to sanction six Chinese and Hong Kong officials.

The US consul general in Hong Kong, Gregory May, this month said Washington will be “closely watching the expected verdicts… and their sentencing”.

A group of United Nations human rights experts said in October they were “very troubled about the use of mass trials” in cases under the national security law.

Stay current - Follow FMT on WhatsApp, Google news and Telegram

Subscribe to our newsletter and get news delivered to your mailbox.