Missing radars highlight Malaysia’s vulnerability to arms smugglers

Missing radars highlight Malaysia’s vulnerability to arms smugglers

A proper investigation from an independent body is needed, not just an internal probe by the customs department and international trade ministry.

Liew-Chin-Tong-radar-missing-1
By Liew Chin Tong

Few eyebrows were raised today at the discovery that high-tech military radar equipment worth millions of ringgit had gone missing from the Port of Tanjung Pelepas (PTP) after the shipment arrived a month ago.

Malaysia’s descent into a globally-renowned kleptocracy has sunk to a new low when not only can billions of illicit funds be siphoned offshore through the 1MDB scandal, but our nation is now vulnerable to becoming a transit point for arms smuggling.

The greater cause for concern is that the authorities did not even realise that the radars were missing until an audit check accidentally stumbled upon the mysterious disappearance.

Is this a repeat of the 2009 missing F5 fighter jet engines, when authorities kept mum about the theft and only came clean after it was revealed by Wikileaks?

Given Malaysia’s strategic location in a sensitive geopolitical region and less-than-stellar corruption record, we are unfortunately a potential magnet for international crimes.

Today’s discovery of the missing radars raises three red flags:

1) How did sensitive military equipment arrive on our shores without possessing the required documentation?

To gain clearance, the importer must submit information and declare the contents of a shipment to the port authority, even if it is passing en route to the final destination.

It could not arrive under the radar unless the importer was confident they could cobble together the documentation during the layover, with the aid of certain well-placed insiders who were in cahoots with the covert operation.

2) Why didn’t the custom authorities take action once they discovered the equipment was without permit, instead of keeping quiet until the audit check revealed that the equipment had conveniently gone missing?

According to procedure, a shipping agent must submit the load list to the port operator. When PTP became aware of the contents of the shipment during customs clearance period and the equipment was found to not possess the necessary permits, why was it not immediately returned and action taken?

Port authorities and the customs department must explain what the wait was for, because the long waiting period conveniently allowed the radars to go missing, presumably smuggled out.

3) How could the radars have been smuggled out of the port without clearance?

Neither the importer nor the receiving party raised alarm bells even after the shipment was supposedly stranded at customs for a month. This seems to indicate a strong likelihood of the equipment already being smuggled out and having reached its intended destination.

Proper investigation from an independent body should be conducted, instead of just relying on internal investigation by the customs department and international trade ministry, which are inexplicably linked behind the scenes of this smuggling operation.

Liew Chin Tong is DAP national political education director and MP for Kluang.

With a firm belief in freedom of expression and without prejudice, FMT tries its best to share reliable content from third parties. Such articles are strictly the writer’s personal opinion. FMT does not necessarily endorse the views or opinions given by any third party content provider.

Stay current - Follow FMT on WhatsApp, Google news and Telegram

Subscribe to our newsletter and get news delivered to your mailbox.