Tee, in a tirade against this group in his weekly Sinar Harian column, accused MCA and Gerakan of being even more ultra than the “ultra kiasu party.”
It is believed the “ultra kiasu party” he was referring to was the DAP.
Tee said the “ultra kiasu” in the Cabinet were only there because of Malay votes.
He also remarked how too much “dedak” (rice husks used as animal feed) had already been given to them, a fact he hoped Umno was well aware of.
Tee said the “ultra kiasu” were everywhere, and not just on the “island”, presumably Penang, and that “ultra kiasu”, many of whom were Christian evangelists were controlling the BN and Pakatan Harapan.
“I am not against Christians but evangelists are very dangerous, so are Jews who are Zionists.”
He said the “ultra kiasu” were anti-Islam and constantly called for diversity in their bid to erase the Malay Muslim identity of Malaysia.
The UniSZA lecturer also said the “ultra kiasu”, who were pushing for pluralism and liberalism as a means of leading Muslims away from Islam, were targeting young Malays who supported LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) rights and casual sex.
This he said was one way to ensure the Malays would no longer vote for Umno or PAS any more.
According to Tee, the “ultra kiasu” did not want to see Malays cover their aurat and preferred hiring those who did not wear headscarves. The “ultra kiasu” he also said would cry “Arabisation” when a Malay wanted to become more pious.
He made further allegations that the “ultra kiasu” did not allow Muslim employees to pray, that they wanted the Shariah court abolished and that Islamic law abide by international norms. Tee was also against the “ultra kiasu” for wanting to grant Muslims the freedom to leave their religion, amongst others.
“Rise my brethren before it is too late, make sure this country which is rooted in Islam and the Malay race is not torn by the evil of the ‘ultra kiasu’. Unite.”