Petronas Gas acknowledges RM68mil lawsuit, reaffirms continuity

Petronas Gas acknowledges RM68mil lawsuit, reaffirms continuity

The utilities firm says it has appointed legal counsel to advise and represent them in court proceedings.

taman puchong perdana
Thirty-six residents at Putra Heights are seeking damages and compensation for their losses in the pipeline blaze on April 1. (Bernama pic)
PETALING JAYA:
Petronas Gas Bhd said today it does not expect the RM68 million lawsuit filed by 36 Putra Heights residents to have any material, financial or operational impact on the company.

The utilities firm said, however, that this was subject to the outcome of court proceedings and based on information available to date.

In a Bursa filing, it also said it had appointed legal counsel to advise and represent the company in the matter.

According to the filing, the plaintiffs are also suing Hong & Hong Homes Sdn Bhd, Pinterest Ventures Sdn Bhd, the Subang Jaya City Council (MBSJ) and the government as defendants.

The plaintiffs, led by Loh Poh Heng, have appointed former attorney-general Tommy Thomas as their lead lawyer.

The residents, most of whom are from Taman Putra Harmoni, are also seeking general, aggravated and exemplary damages, as well as legal costs and any other relief deemed fit by the court.

They claimed that Petronas Gas committed the tort of private nuisance and may be liable under the doctrine of Rylands v Fletcher for permitting the escape of gas and fire from its land onto the plaintiffs’ properties.

They further claim breaches of statutory duties under the Gas Supply Act 1993 and the Petroleum (Safety Measures) (Transportation of Petroleum through Pipelines) Regulations 1985.

The gas pipeline explosion on April 1 sent flames soaring over 30m high, with temperatures reaching 1,000°C. No fatalities were reported, but about 150 people sought hospital treatment.

The fire left a crater measuring 21m by 24m and 10m deep. Eighty-one houses were destroyed, 81 more partially damaged, and 57 were affected by heat or debris.

Investigations by the authorities identified unstable soil conditions beneath the pipeline as the cause of the blaze.

Stay current - Follow FMT on WhatsApp, Google news and Telegram

Subscribe to our newsletter and get news delivered to your mailbox.