Man loses appeal over conviction for raping wife’s teenage sister

Man loses appeal over conviction for raping wife’s teenage sister

Court of Appeal says the appeal lacked merit but reduced his jail term to 20 years from the original 30 years set by a lower court.

The Court of Appeal upheld the guilty verdict on the lorry driver, who was charged with raping his 14-year-old sister-in-law on two occasions in 2018. (Reuters pic)
PUTRAJAYA:
A lorry driver was sentenced to 20 years in jail and ordered to be given 20 strokes of the rotan after losing his appeal to set aside his conviction on two counts of raping his teenage sister-in-law.

A Court of Appeal panel comprising justices Kamaludin Said, Nordin Hassan and Hashim Hamzah dismissed the man’s appeal against his conviction after finding that his appeal had no merit.

However, the court allowed the 33-year-old man’s appeal to reduce his imprisonment term from 15 years to 10 years in jail for each count.

In delivering the court’s decision, Kamaludin, who led the panel, sentenced the man to 10 years imprisonment and 10 strokes of the rotan for each count and ordered him to serve the sentences consecutively, which means he has to serve 20 years in jail.

The accused was found guilty and sentenced to a total of 30 years in prison and 20 strokes of the rotan by the sessions court on July 3, 2019 for raping the 14-year-old girl on two occassions in a house in Pasir Puteh, Kelantan in February 2018 and April 19, 2018.

The sessions court had sentenced him to 15 years in jail and 10 strokes of the rotan for each count and ordered him to serve the sentences consecutively.

He was charged under Section 376 (3) of the Penal Code which provides that whoever commits rape on a woman whose relationship to him is such that he is not permitted under the law, religion, custom or usage, to marry her, would be punished with an imprisonment term of not less than eight years and not more than 30 years, and shall be punished with whipping of not less than 10 strokes, if found guilty.

The accused lost his appeal at the High Court which was dismissed on Nov 23, last year.

According to the evidence adduced by the prosecution, the man was the husband to the victim’s sister and the couple divorced six years later when a police report was lodged after the rape incident.

In his defence, he said that he met the victim on the two dates but denied raping her.

He was represented by lawyers Geethan Ram Vincent and Eu Kah Mun while deputy public prosecutor Fairuz Johari appeared for the prosecution.

Stay current - Follow FMT on WhatsApp, Google news and Telegram

Subscribe to our newsletter and get news delivered to your mailbox.