YouTube star Pavithra’s husband given discharge not amounting to acquittal

YouTube star Pavithra’s husband given discharge not amounting to acquittal

Court also sets Oct 22 for re-mention of second charge against Sugu for carrying an offensive weapon.

M Sugu (right) is alleged to have assaulted Pavithra using a mobile phone and a sickle outside the Raja Permaisuri Bainun Hospital in Ipoh on July 21. (Bernama pic)
IPOH:
The Sessions Court here today granted a discharge not amounting to an acquittal to former estate worker M Sugu for allegedly assaulting his wife YouTube sensation S Pavithra on July 21.

Judge Norashima Khalid made the decision after allowing deputy public prosecutor Liyana Zawani Mohd Radzi’s application, following the oath taken by Pavithra to withdraw the charge voluntarily without coercion and intimidation during the proceeding today.

Earlier, lawyer Syahrul Nizam Mohd Rabi, who was representing Sugu, appealed to the court to discharge and acquit the accused as the main witness of the case, who was also the complainant, had stated that she did not want to proceed with the case against her husband.

However, Liyana asked the court to give the accused a discharge not amounting to an acquittal, taking into account the possibility that the prosecution might have a strong need or reason for the case to be reinstated.

Sugu, 29, was alleged to have assaulted Pavithra, 28, using a mobile phone and a sickle which caused injuries to her lips, left cheek and right arm at the parking lot of Raja Permaisuri Bainun Hospital (HRPB) here between 4pm and 6pm on July 21.

The charge, under Section 324 of the Penal Code and read together with Section 326A of the Penal Code, carries a jail term of up to 10 years or a fine or whipping or with any two of such punishments upon conviction.

Sugu was also charged under Section 6(1) of the Corrosive and Explosive Substances and Offensive Weapons Act 1958, for carrying an offensive weapon, a sickle, about 6pm at the same place and date.

On this, the charge, the defence lawyer said he would send a letter of representation to the prosecution to review the status of the case and the charge made against Sugu.

The court set Oct 22 for re-mention.

Stay current - Follow FMT on WhatsApp, Google news and Telegram

Subscribe to our newsletter and get news delivered to your mailbox.