Global body sees downside in breaking MAHB’s monopoly

Global body sees downside in breaking MAHB’s monopoly

Airports Council International says competition can be good but may cause inconsistency of operations.

PETALING JAYA:
The term “monopoly” may not be entirely negative when applied to the business of airport management, at least according to the Airports Council International (ACI), the sole global representative of the world’s airports.

Speaking to FMT, ACI’s Asia-Pacific Regional Director Patti Chau said there might be problems in the consistency of operations if Malaysia Airports Holding Berhad (MAHB) were to lose the monopoly it is currently enjoying.

She was commenting on reports that the government is looking into breaking that monopoly.

If competition were allowed, she said, passengers might have to bear with inconsistencies of operations and services as they travel through the different airports in Malaysia.

There might be other challenges as well, she added, but did not elaborate.

However, she acknowledged that “introducing competition into any environment would always spur improvement” and result in a push for better services.

She would not speculate on whether the pros would outweigh the cons if MAHB were to lose its monopoly, saying only that it would depend on the long term vision and economic environment that MAHB has to cope with.

Stay current - Follow FMT on WhatsApp, Google news and Telegram

Subscribe to our newsletter and get news delivered to your mailbox.