“Revenge quitting” is on the rise as employees push back against poor leadership and toxic cultures. This workplace trend involves employees resigning – usually loudly, to make a statement.

Workers in different fields are leaving their employment not just for better possibilities but also to protest unfair treatment and burnout in unhealthy environments. But is revenge quitting really a successful kind of protest, or does it cause more personal harm than good?

Since the pandemic, employees have since placed greater priority on mental health, work-life balance, and fair treatment. Many people choose dramatic exits to expose poisonous cultures and send a message to their companies when these expectations are overlooked.

Social media has greatly influenced this: viral tales of quitting abound on platforms like LinkedIn and TikTok, where workers emphatically explain their reasons for leaving, even calling out corporations by name. This form of public resignation is gathering momentum and inspiring others to object to poor working conditions.

While revenge quitting can provide a sense of justice and empowerment, long-term consequences are not always favourable. Here are some pros and cons:

Pros

• Take a stand: Dramatic quitters draw attention to workplace problems, potentially leading businesses to change their policies and culture.
• Mental health relief: Leaving a bad job can be freeing, lowering stress and enhancing general wellbeing.
• Create a standard: Publicised exits might inspire other staff members to speak up for improved working conditions.

Cons

• Burn bridges: Companies are less likely to offer a positive reference for people who depart on unfavourable terms, influencing their future employment opportunities.
• Limited impact: Although acts of dramatic quitting make a statement, they rarely result in significant improvements unless accompanied by more significant group action.
• Financial instability: Quitting impulsively without a backup strategy can cause financial stress, especially in cases with limited job opportunities.

So, is it an effective approach?

The workplace situation in question and how the exit is handled will determine how effective an act of revenge quitting will be. Leaving without an effective plan could backfire, leaving the worker without financial stability or future employment opportunities.

But if an employee publicly exposes a toxic workplace and this receives considerable traction, it might force businesses to change.

Still, strategic quitting – where workers document workplace problems, network for better prospects, and leave in a way that maintains their professional reputation while making a statement – may be a more powerful option.

All in all, revenge quitting is a brave approach to workplace toxicity and unfair treatment, but it is not always the best course of action. Before acting rashly, staff members should consider the financial and emotional repercussions. Remember: long-lasting transformation usually calls for more than a dramatic farewell.

This article was originally written by Anisa Aznan for jobstore.com, an online job site that specialises in providing jobseekers with the latest job opportunities by matching talented individuals with reputable companies in Malaysia. Find your dream job with over 40,000 job vacancies in Malaysia.

Read more articles from Jobstore here.